Fragmentation versus Stability in Bimodal Coalitions
نویسنده
چکیده
Competing bimodal coalitions among a group of actors are discussed. First, a model from political sciences is revisited. Most of the model statements are found not to be contained in the model. Second, a new coalition model is built. It accounts for local versus global alignment with respect to the joining of a coalition. The existence of two competing world coaltions is found to yield one unique stable distribution of actors. On the opposite a unique world leadership allows the emergence of unstable relationships. In parallel to regular actors which have a clear coalition choice, “neutral”, “frustrated” and “risky” actors are produced. The cold war organisation after world war II is shown to be rather stable. The emergence of a fragmentation process from eastern group disappearance is explained as well as continuing western group stability. Some hints are obtained about possible policies to stabilize world nation relationships. European construction is analyzed with respect to european stability. Chinese stability is also discussed. Permanent address. Laboratoire associé au CNRS (URA n 17) Laboratoire associé au CNRS (URA n 800)
منابع مشابه
Are Electoral Coalitions Harmful for Democratic Consolidation in Africa?
Electoral coalitions are becoming increasingly popular among opposition parties in Africa because they offer many advantages with respect to reducing party fragmentation and increasing incumbent turnovers. At the same time, however, they are often comprised of parties that are defined predominantly by their leaders’ personalities and exhibit little differentiation in terms of their policy orien...
متن کاملIndividual Stability in Hedonic Coalition Formation
I study the existence of Nash-stable and individually stable coalition structures in hedonic coalition formation games, where a coalition structure is a partition of the players, and players strictly rank the coalitions to which they belong. The hedonic coalition formation game in which all coalitions are feasible is viewed as a general model, and more specific models, such as the marriage and ...
متن کاملOn the Stability of Coalitions : A Rough Set Approach
The aim of the article is to evaluate coalition stability in multi-party systems with the use of the rough set theory. In this approach an information system including all members of a legislature with their votes is used, and coalitions are considered rough sets defined by their lower and upper approximations. Based on these approximations, three categories of coalitions according to their sta...
متن کاملCoalition Formation in Manets
Wireless ad-hoc networks rely on the cooperation of participating nodes for almost all their functions. However, due to resource constraints, nodes are generally selfish and try to maximize their own benefit when participating in the network. Therefore, it is important to study mechanisms which can be used as incentives to form coalitions inside the network. In this paper, we study coalition fo...
متن کاملEfficiency vs. stability of climate coalitions: a conceptual and computational appraisal
This paper evaluates with numbers the respective merits of two competing notions of coalition stability in the standard global public goods model as customarily applied to the climate change problem. To this effect it uses an the integrated assessment CWS model. After a reminder of the two game theoretical stability notions involved – namely, core-stability and internal-external stability – and...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1996